Hi! Bruno Haible wrote:

Michael Goffioul wrote:

...

- struct/class, const/non-const: at some places, CLN foward declares objects as being "class", while there are actually "struct"; VC++ generates different mangled names for struct and class, so you end up with unresolved references.

What does the C++ standard say about this? Is CLN right, or is MSVC++ right?

I don't think it is worth checking what the standard says about this. Even if it permits such sloppiness, they should be avoided. I'll prepare a patch for CLN. -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>