28 Oct
2008
28 Oct
'08
7:30 a.m.
darn it, my email client screwed up the expression, hopefully this works better from both ends 16*(1.0)*z1*(dz2.[1,0])*((1.0)*p2[1]^(-1)*z1*dz2[0]+(1.0)*p2[1]^(-1)*z2*dz1[0]) -(631.6546816697189115)*p1[2]*(1.0)^2*z1^2*z2^2 +16*(1.0)*z2*((1.0)*p2[0]^(-1)*z1*dz2[1]+(1.0)*p2[0]^(-1)*z2*dz1[1])*(dz1.[0,1]) +16*(1.0)*z2*((1.0)*p2[1]^(-1)*z1*dz2[0]+(1.0)*p2[1]^(-1)*z2*dz1[0])*(dz1.[1,0]) +16*(1.0)*z1*(dz2.[0,1])*((1.0)*p2[0]^(-1)*z1*dz2[1]+(1.0)*p2[0]^(-1)*z2*dz1[1])
legend: p1,p2,dz1,dz2,dz3 are vectors, z1, z2, z3 are scalars p2[0],p2[1] etc are components [1,0], [0,1] etc are vectors too (dz1 . dz2) etc are inner products