On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:40:43 -0800, Dale Lukas Peterson <hazelnusse@gmail.com> said:
DL> I'm sure this is low priority, but I was hoping somebody could DL> respond regarding whether adding set_TeX_name() to the symbol DL> class makes sense, and whether the TeX_name member should be DL> mutable just like name member is. Just as a suggestion: instead of an introduction of a separate method set_TeX_name(), may be simpler to modify set_name() to have an optional second argument for the Tex name (similar to the symbol() method). -- Vladimir V. Kisil email: kisilv@maths.leeds.ac.uk www: http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/ Book: Geometry of Mobius Transformations http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/p835