Dear Vladimir, thanks for your suggestion. I had a closer look at the clifford class, and my original idea was to use a clifford unit object as a dummy representation of a spinor. However, this doesn't seem to be possible since the eval_ncmul function assumes that all clifford objects anitcommute (see line 550 in clifford.cpp) with dirac_gamma5. On the other hand, all objects that do not belong to the clifford class do commute with the gamma matrices, such that there seems to be no way to define a spinor object that a) doesn't commute with any of the gammas b) doesn't anticommute with dirac_gamma5 Any ideas? Cheers, Vladyslav On 14/08/14 19:36, Vladimir V. Kisil wrote:
Dear Vladyslav,
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:14:07 +0200, Vladyslav Shtabovenko <v.shtabovenko@tum.de> said: VCh> I'm wondering if it is possible to define Dirac spinors in the VCh> context of Clifford objects,
Look section "4.15.1.2 A generic Clifford algebra" of the tutorial, this may provide the functionality which you are looking for.
Best wishes, Vladimir