Re: [GiNaC-list] Bug with evalm()?

Dear Alexei and others, On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Sheplyakov Alexei wrote:

First of all, this violates principle of least surprise. For all other classes map() operates on each term, why pseries should be different?

Okay, then I think it is best to create a method pseries::evalm and have evalm act on every coefficient in the power series. The variable and expansion piont shoulnt' be matrix value anyway, as far as I know. Any objections against that? Best wishes, Chris