16 Apr
2009
16 Apr
'09
1:10 p.m.
Hi, Michael Goffioul schrieb:
I'm currently tracking down these issues by running the test suite in the source package, but this might not catch all of them. If you are interested, I can send a patch once I succeed to run the test suite completely.
yes, that would be interesting! I'd like to see where this happens. I don't have access to a VC compiler to try it myself, though. I see no problem with dereferencing end(), and doing operations like end()+<integer>. In that case, end() should return a proper iterator as a temporary and on these the operations +,- are defined (somewhere 24.1.5 in the standard, I believe). But maybe there is a ++ or -- involved? Regards, Jens