9 Apr
2001
9 Apr
'01
12:52 p.m.
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Pearu Peterson wrote:
I have noticed that ncmul(2,a,3) results mul(a,6).
Why is this type change ncmul -> mul? Will ncmul be depreciated in future?
No, ncmul is not deprecated and will be needed. The above simplification is just the specified behaviour of ncmul::eval(). Looks like the rules in <http://www.ginac.de/reference/ncmul_cpp-source.html#l00329> actually work. Regards -richy. -- Richard Kreckel <Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE> <http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/> - To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ginac-list@ginac.de with a subject of "unsubscribe".