Hi, On 10/05/2016 12:08 AM, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
I will do a release 1.7.2 these days with just this fixed.
No, wait! The function 'method virtual GiNaC::ex GiNaC::pointer_to_map_function_1arg<const GiNaC::ex&>::operator()(const GiNaC::ex&)' removed from the ABI is this template class method operator() declared in <ginac/ex.h>: template<class T1> class pointer_to_map_function_1arg : public map_function { protected: ex (*ptr)(const ex &, T1); T1 arg1; public: explicit pointer_to_map_function_1arg(ex x(const ex &, T1), T1 a1) : ptr(x), arg1(a1) {} ex operator()(const ex & e) override { return ptr(e, arg1); } //!!! }; What happend is that a GiNaC-internal static function has stopped using a pointer_to_map_function_1arg<const GiNaC::ex&> object. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I suppose that any program/library linked against GiNaC will have to get its own copy of that method at compile time. And that makes this *not* an ABI breakage, right? -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>