Dear Richard, Thanks for properly fixing it. Looking into the matter I also was not able to understand LaTeX printing routine for zeta with two parameters: it outputs \zeta(10) for zeta(10,x). But as I said, I am not familiar with zeta with two arguments to judge the situation. Best wishes, Vladimir -- Vladimir V. Kisil http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/ Book: Geometry of Mobius Transformations http://goo.gl/EaG2Vu Software: Geometry of cycles http://moebinv.sourceforge.net/ Jupyter: https://github.com/vvkisil/MoebInv-notebooks
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 00:13:11 +0200, "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel@in.terlu.de> said:
RK> Hi! RK> On 06.04.20 14:23, Vladimir V. Kisil wrote: >> It seems there is indeed an issue with archiving zeta2, since >> both versions has the same name (it may be similar issues with >> other overloaded function names). I do not know what is zeta, but >> I am attaching a patch fixing it. To have the same printout of >> the function as before, a new function zeta2_print_dflt() has to >> be introduced. RK> Thanks a lot for the patch! RK> I think we can do a little bit better in this case: The archive RK> contains the function's number of parameters - after all the RK> parameters are stored in it. So, let's use this information and RK> try a little harder matching the correct overload when reading RK> the archive node. RK> I've committed a fix. RK> Cheers -richy. RK> PS: Vladimir, I can't believe that you don't know what zeta is. RK> :) _______________________________________________ GiNaC-list RK> mailing list GiNaC-list@ginac.de RK> https://www.ginac.de/mailman/listinfo/ginac-list