Dear Chris, I answered your mail already weeks ago, but due to some confusion with our mailing list it went to nirvana. Sorry. On Fri, 6 May 2005, Chris Dams wrote:
You wrote:
- Fixed a library initialization problem.
Why do you think so? The safety suggested by the library_init class is still nothing more than a sham.
This is an exaggeration. The patch below that went in for this release did solve a real initialization crash. I'm sure you'ld agree this alone warrants that NEWS entry. RCS file: /home/cvs/GiNaC/ginac/integral.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- GiNaC/ginac/integral.cpp 2004/10/14 15:36:45 1.2 +++ GiNaC/ginac/integral.cpp 2005/01/07 21:01:53 1.3 @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ } int integral::max_integration_level = 15; -ex integral::relative_integration_error = power(10,-8).evalf(); +ex integral::relative_integration_error = 1e-8; ex subsvalue(const ex & var, const ex & value, const ex & fun) { Regards -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>