Re: [GiNaC-list] GiNaC::marix::solve(..)

4 Jun 2009


      Hi!

Lisa Maletzki wrote:
...
That was a little overhasty I suppose because I came across another 
problem. The following snippet of code will give me a 
matrix::operator(): index out of range.
unsigned size = 18;
matrix vectorX(size, 1);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < size; i++) {
    vectorX(i, 1) = vars[i];
}
Well, vectorX(i, 1) refers to the second column.
GiNaC follows C/C++ index notation throughout.

   -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>