Do Hoang Son just raised the issue why in print_latex context rationals are not typeset as \frac{3}{5} but instead as plain 3/5. Before implementing this I would like to ask if anybody is having an objection? Regards -richy. -- Richard Kreckel <Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE> <http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>
Hi, I think \frac{3}{5} would indeed be better than 3/5. Originally I didn't bother because rationals are printed using CLN's printing routine. Therefore no objections from my side, TeXmacs should be able to handle \frac{3}{5} and it looks even nicer. Stefan On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
Do Hoang Son just raised the issue why in print_latex context rationals are not typeset as \frac{3}{5} but instead as plain 3/5. Before implementing this I would like to ask if anybody is having an objection?
Regards -richy. -- Richard Kreckel <Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE> <http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>
Hi! On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 08:50:59AM +0200, Stefan Weinzierl wrote:
I think \frac{3}{5} would indeed be better than 3/5.
And maybe we should do this for polynomial fractions as well (i.e. collect all positive and negative powers in a mul and output a \frac unless they are all positive or all negative)? Bye, Christian -- / Coding on PowerPC and proud of it \/ http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bauec002/
participants (3)
-
Christian Bauer
-
Richard B. Kreckel
-
Stefan Weinzierl