Dear all, I discovered that the numerical integration routine that I wrote does not handle complex functions. The inequalities in the error checking are the problem. Therefore, I added some abs-function to the code. BTW, maybe it would be a good idea to include the numerical evalution for the gamma function that I comitted last friday in 1.3 as well? Maybe it could also go into release today? Bye, Chris
Chris, Chris Dams wrote:
BTW, maybe it would be a good idea to include the numerical evalution for the gamma function that I comitted last friday in 1.3 as well? Maybe it could also go into release today?
Is there a reason why didn't you hook up your numerical evaluation to the eval functions? I think users will find this behavior slightly irritating:
sin(3.141592000); 6.53589793238438481E-7 tgamma(3.141592000); tgamma(3.141592) evalf(%); 2.2880363339786210185
Cheers -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>
Dear Richy, On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
Is there a reason why didn't you hook up your numerical evaluation to the eval functions? I think users will find this behavior slightly irritating:
I guess, because I missed the comments that asked me to do so ;-). I now fixed this in CVS. Best, Chris
participants (2)
-
Chris Dams
-
Richard B. Kreckel