On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 00:54:16 +0200, "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel@in.terlu.de> said:
RK> Dear Vladimir, On 9/3/22 22:59, Vladimir V. Kisil wrote: >> I am proposing a small patch which provides some elementary >> info() methods to GiNaC predefined transcendental functions. Only >> easy answers are sought, which can be decided on info tests of >> the functions arguments. From such coarse viewpoint functions are >> grouped into several classes and the respective routines can be >> shared. RK> Thanks for the patch; the logic is good. RK> But we should all heed compiler warnings! You are right, Richard. It is good that you noted and fixed the spurious typo, but I shall review patches more careful before submission. -- Vladimir V. Kisil http://www.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/ Book: Geometry of Mobius Maps https://doi.org/10.1142/p835 Soft: Geometry of cycles http://moebinv.sourceforge.net/ Jupyter notebooks: https://github.com/vvkisil?tab=repositories RK> And so it turns out RK> that the patch contains a really interesting typo: 'deafult' RK> instead of 'default'. This compiles: it's just a label due to RK> the colon. Fixing it makes GCC shut up the warning "control RK> reaches end of non-void function". (I first thought GCC is RK> overly grouchy. I've never seen such a bug before.) RK> -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel