9 Nov
2005
9 Nov
'05
4:46 p.m.
Hi Chris, Chris Dams wrote:
I found out that 1.has(0) returns true. Iteresting ;-o. A patch is attached.
This made me wonder about 2.has(2*I). It returns true. Is this really the idea?
I am not sure, but I don't think so. I modified your patch slighty to cover that case too (and put it into CVS). Regards, Jens