8 Nov
2005
8 Nov
'05
6:27 p.m.
Dear Jens, On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Jens Vollinga wrote:
Chris Dams wrote:
Actually, I am not really entirely certain if this subs_option is the right way to go. On the one hand, the fact that constructing powers of
I would appreciate some input on this issue.
is the new subs_option only to conserve compability with unknown user programs (sorry, I didn't dig into the patch code yet) ?
Also with GiNaCs own symmetrization over dummy indices (as done by simplify_indexed). Clearly it is wrong to rename the dummy indices in this case. Best, Chris