11 May
2011
11 May
'11
12:17 a.m.
Hi Alexei and Jens, On 05/11/2011 12:13 AM, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
[...] We can pass it as an extra argument to conjugateepvector(), in order to retain binary compatibility.
I'ld propose to fix it similar to the patch attached. [...]
Without the maintenance branch, what now? That patch goes to some lenghts in order to retain binary compatibility. Should I bother or should I simplify it and bump the soname version? -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>