Re: Is relational::is_equal patch needed?

21 Nov 2001

      Hi,

On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Pearu Peterson wrote:
...
I have noticed that
  relational(a,b,==).is_equal(relational(b,a,==))
returns
  0
Is this expected behaviour for GiNaC internals? I just want to know
whether it is worth to write a patch such that
  a==b .is_equal(b==a)    -> 1
  a<b  .is_equal(b>a)	-> 1
  etc.
that should be implemented in the method
  relational::is_equal_same_type
right?
Sounds good to me.

Can you send a patch?  I am planning to put out 1.0.1 tomorrow.

Cheers
   -richy.
-- 
Richard B. Kreckel
<Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE>
<http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>