"JV" == Jens Vollinga <vollinga@physik.uni-wuppertal.de> writes: JV> But, one further objection: you both don't seem to agree... Could you JV> give some clarification?
This is so far the independent work done by Daniel alone, I only suggested the topic. A wider agreement should be reached for further steps. JV> From the examples you gave, like tan(x) or cycles, it seems to JV> me that only a new print context is needed. I am in favour of printing context with seamless infrastructure for further extensions by users/developers, (eg virtual methods?). JV> whether there should be just another print context or in JV> addition to that several new methods to class basic. Eg it may be a kind of route implemented in power(): the printing context first checks are there any specific drawing methods defined for the given class/defined scene combination and if not---fall back to the default procedure. Best wishes, Vladimir -- Vladimir V. Kisil email: kisilv@maths.leeds.ac.uk -- www: http://maths.leeds.ac.uk/~kisilv/