Re: [GiNaC-devel] Implicit derivation of functions (re-submission)

On 01/04/2015 11:32 AM, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:

And you're probably right that the not having to code the chain rule manually in most cases makes the code so much more straightforward that it's worth maintaining this more general case in the long run.

Should be: ...it's worth maintaining this special case in the long run. Sorry. -richard. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://in.terlu.de/~kreckel/>