Hi, On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alexander Frink wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
Now, that we have an input parser, I fancy an idea: We can randomly create all sorts of rational numbers with weird exponents, rational complex bases etc. and build an ex from it. This has then been run through the
If you replace "random" by "pseudo-random", i.e. deterministic, then this sounds like a good idea.
While nitpicking: if you give us some real random number source it shouldn't make a difference. :-)
However I dislike a "make check" which passes with a probability of 95% and mysteriously fails in 5%.
Hmmmmm??? Why should it fail at all? The whole point about the default output and the input-parser (a.k.a. ginsh-input syntax) was to be mutually compatible. Saludos -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE> <http://wwwthep.physik.uni-mainz.de/~kreckel/>