2 Oct
2009
2 Oct
'09
2:11 p.m.
Vladimir V. Kisil wrote:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:13 +0200, "Richard B. Kreckel" <kreckel@ginac.de> said: RK> Maybe it is just too late, but I don't see the motivation for RK> the "is x an integer" condition.
Why not, if it is a correct substitution. Who know, may be as a result of some evaluation power of the exponents will becomes 2.
I think it is wrong to include "x is an integer." Even 1^i (which is exp(0)^i) is not well defined (it can be any of e^(2 pi n) for all integers).