11 Dec
2006
11 Dec
'06
12:10 p.m.
Chris, Chris Dams wrote:
BTW, maybe it would be a good idea to include the numerical evalution for the gamma function that I comitted last friday in 1.3 as well? Maybe it could also go into release today?
Is there a reason why didn't you hook up your numerical evaluation to the eval functions? I think users will find this behavior slightly irritating:
sin(3.141592000); 6.53589793238438481E-7 tgamma(3.141592000); tgamma(3.141592) evalf(%); 2.2880363339786210185
Cheers -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>