1 Feb
2005
1 Feb
'05
noon
Dear Richy, On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
const ex _ex120 = _ex120
Hmm, so this is not DR 363 because _ex120 has been initialized before?
Well it looks like this "DR 363" to me. With the small detail that _ex120 has sneakily been initialized before... ;-).
<http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_closed.html#363>. Anyway, I'm getting convinced that your code is valid...
Well, I had some doubts about const ex _ex120 = _ex120; myself but the compiler did not mind. Now looking at this link, it appears that even the standardization committee likes it :-). Best wishes, Chris