10 Apr
2020
10 Apr
'20
3:26 p.m.
Hi, I came along a small bug in the numerical evaluation of alternating Euler sums of depth 1, when in the input no lists are used:
evalf(zeta({5},{1})); 1.0369277551433699263 evalf(zeta(5,1)); 1.0369277551433699263 evalf(zeta({5},{-1})); -0.972119770446909306 evalf(zeta(5,-1)); zeta(5,-1)
The attached patch fixes the last case, so zeta(5,-1) is now also evaluated numerically. Best wishes, Stefan