Roberto Bagnara <bagnara@cs.unipr.it> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Roberto Bagnara <bagnara@cs.unipr.it> writes: | > | > [...] | > | > | What is important is that the GCC people taking care of the standard | > | library do the right thing. Since they know that someone may very | > | legitimately wish to compile with, e.g., -W -Wall, they write code | > | like | > | | > | virtual iter_type | > | do_get_time(iter_type __s, iter_type /*__end*/, ios_base&, | > | ios_base::iostate& /*__err*/, tm* /*__t*/) const | > | { return __s; } | > | > I'm one of those GCC people taking care of the library and I can | > assure you I don't particularly appreciate that style (like some other | > things in the V3 STYLE). So, I would say that you should be very | > careful in drawing conclusions from things you might read in the V3 | > source code -- not every one has the same idea of the styles to be used. | | It is not a matter of style: it is a matter of respect for the users. I guess it depends on what you define to be irrespectful for users. Given the tone you're taking and the lack of recognizing actual facst, I guess there is no much interest in continuing this thread. [...] | Huh? Looks like a copy-and-paste error... No. Just go and check out. -- Gaby