On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
Does this introduce a lot of changes in other modules where stuff is tested for is_ex_of_type(foo, symbol)? I don't exactly see tons of such stuff...
in printcsrc.cpp, this should be replaced by is_ex_exactly_of_type(foo,symbol) || is_ex_exactly_of_type(foo,constant) in series.cpp, the is_ex_of_type(var_,symbol) should be is_ex_exactly_of_type(var_,symbol) (or do we want a power series expansion in Pi?) in symbol.cpp, the // ASSERT(is_ex_exactly_of_type(ls.op(i),symbol)); ASSERT(is_ex_of_type(ls.op(i),symbol)); was changed quickly to get rid of the subs bug for constants. -- Alexander Frink E-Mail: Alexander.Frink@Uni-Mainz.DE Institut fuer Physik Phone: +49-6131-393391 Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitaet D-55099 Mainz, Germany