Building PDF, PostScript, and DVI versions of the documentation fails with the following error message(s): ../../doc/cln.texi:1170: Argument of @asis has an extra }. <inserted text> @par <to be read again> } According to texinfo maintainer @itemize @asis is illegal, one should use @itemize @w{} instead [1]. [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2009-03/msg00016.html --- doc/cln.texi | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/cln.texi b/doc/cln.texi index 7c0aa5f..d16f8af 100644 --- a/doc/cln.texi +++ b/doc/cln.texi @@ -1167,7 +1167,7 @@ Returns the complex conjugate of @code{x}. We have the relations -@itemize @asis +@itemize @w{} @item @code{x = complex(realpart(x), imagpart(x))} @item @@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ down exactly as often as it rounds up. The functions are related like this: -@itemize @asis +@itemize @w{} @item @code{ceiling(m/n) = floor((m+n-1)/n) = floor((m-1)/n)+1} for rational numbers @code{m/n} (@code{m}, @code{n} integers, @code{n}>0), and @@ -2091,7 +2091,7 @@ come from @code{newbyte} and the other bits come from @code{n}. The following relations hold: -@itemize @asis +@itemize @w{} @item @code{ldb (n, b) = mask_field(n, b) >> b.position}, @item @@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ If @code{x} is already an exact number, this function returns @code{x}. If @code{x} is any float, one has -@itemize @asis +@itemize @w{} @item @code{cl_float(rational(x),x) = x} @item @@ -2628,7 +2628,7 @@ one digit in the non-exponent part. The exponent has the syntax @var{expmarker} @var{expsign} @{@var{digit}@}+. The exponent marker is -@itemize @asis +@itemize @w{} @item @samp{s} for short-floats, @item @@ -2646,7 +2646,7 @@ function @samp{float_format}. @item Complex numbers External representation: -@itemize @asis +@itemize @w{} @item In algebraic notation: @code{@var{realpart}+@var{imagpart}i}. Of course, if @var{imagpart} is negative, its printed representation begins with -- 1.7.1