25 Aug
2004
25 Aug
'04
5:11 p.m.
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:44:31PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Now I'd like to know if this a sign of yet another gcc regression before reporting it?
Yes. This code compiles fine with gcc-3.3 (well, "fine" means that it takes 700 MB RAM to compile it), so a bug report to the GCC people is in order. It will be most convincing to show them the preprocessed C++ code and the result of "nm" on the g++ generated object file.
Done after cutting down to a small example: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17182 Regards, Ralf