6 Sep
2006
6 Sep
'06
6:30 a.m.
Hello Richard, * Richard B. Kreckel wrote on Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:36:38AM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Just curious: Is there any technical reason for this recent change in the CVS version of CLN, or is that just for (non)readability?
No technical reason. Only readability and similarity with environments like bash, wordexp(3), etc. where one wants this distinction.
OK, thanks.
The expansion of $(rm /) is quite distinct from that one of ${rm /}, there. I've embarked on a little holy war since when I actually ran into a related problem with command substitution. I believe it's evil to allow command substitution where it doesn't make sense.
Sure, but that's not within a makefile.
I hope there's no problem with this?
No. Cheers, Ralf