26 Aug
2009
26 Aug
'09
11:19 p.m.
Hi! Michael Miller wrote:
Note that libcln.a has gone from 5MB to 131MB. Is that to be expected? (In both cases, I compiled cln using the generic ./configure, make, make check, make install.)
Commit 447a682441a04d2ec95f9f5d1be456d43c88a6ef by Alexei Sheplyakov changed the default compiler optimization flags. Also, the sizes look grossly distorted due to full debug information. Anyway, I've never seen that code sizes are correlated with speed of execution, so I've given up looking at them. -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>