Re: [CLN-list] CLN 1.2.1 -- silent ABI change?

Dear Richard, On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:38:10AM +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:

I don't think so. It would make the two functions unsafe. But these functions can be used only by programs compiled against CLN-1.2.0. Programs compiled using CLN-1.2.1 are safe anyway as the bad signature doesn't exist and programs compiled using CLN-1.2.2 are safe because the bad signature is not exposed and, hence, not used.

OK, this sounds reasonable. Best regards, Alexei -- All science is either physics or stamp collecting.