5 Apr
2008
5 Apr
'08
1:02 a.m.
Alexei Sheplyakov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:38:10AM +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
I don't think so. It would make the two functions unsafe. But these functions can be used only by programs compiled against CLN-1.2.0. Programs compiled using CLN-1.2.1 are safe anyway as the bad signature doesn't exist and programs compiled using CLN-1.2.2 are safe because the bad signature is not exposed and, hence, not used.
OK, this sounds reasonable.
I've checked in such a patch and plan to release CLN-1.2.2 tomorrow. -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/>