Hi Robert,

On 2018-02-24 you resent your mail and patches from 2012-08-15:

> Here is the previous win64 patch set...
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Robert Szalai" <robicjedi@gmail.com>
> Date: Aug 15, 2012 02:22
> Subject: Re: [CLN-list] MinGW64 build
> To: "CLN discussion list" <cln-list@ginac.de>
> Cc:
>
> Hi Alexei,
> >
> > I've splitted the path into 10 parts. There is a bigger one that is only
> > s/long/intptr_t/  and s/unsigned long/uintptr_t/
> > the rest is very small.
> >
> > Hopefully this can now be applied.
> >
> > > Ditto (the corresponding hunk is not quite optimal, though. {s,u}int32
> > > can be typedef'ed to {,u}int32_t => no need for ugly #if's).
> >
> > I was thinking of this, however we need exactly the same underlying type as
> > (u)intptr_t for the same sized integer to avoid compiler confusion.
> > So in some cases (e.g. on i686 Linux) stdint.h might define int32_t as int
> > and intptr_t as long
> > and in this case the compiler will complain about multiple definition of
> > the same function.
> >
> > Bests,
> > Robert

I have applied the 3 parts of your series that were good, and fixed the
remaining problems. Indeed, the problems with the overload conflicts
(in cl_combine, fprintdecimal, fprinthexadecimal) that are caused by the
fact that intptr_t may be 'int', may be 'long', may be 'long long', were
hardest to resolve. I chose not to introduce platform-dependent #ifs
(too hairy to maintain), nor an autoconf test (because the include files
are supposed to be usable by different compilers, and different compilers
may define intptr_t differently), but instead use an inline function
redirection.

Bruno